The Tennessee Court of the Judiciary is the organization that is supposed to police the judges in Tennessee. It is comprised of mainly judges, some attorneys, and a few civilians - however, it is basically run by the judges.
As you have read in earlier posts, many things that would lead to criminal charges for everyday people have only warranted "private reprimands" by the Tennessee Court of the Judiciary. What a JOKE!
There is currently legislation in the General Assembly that would abolish the Tennessee Court of the Judiciary and replace it with another entity to police and investigate judges. However, and organization is only as good as the people who are running it.
The members of the Tennessee Court of the Judiciary (listed on the side of the reprimands that are linked in the below posts) are:
Don R Ash
Presiding Judge
Timothy R. Discenza
Disciplinary Counsel
Patrick J. McHale
Assistant Disciplinary Counsel
Chris Craft
David M. Cook
Angelita Blackshear Dalton
Joe F. Fowlkes
Christy R. Little
Richard A. Manahan
Paul Neely
Pamela L. Reeves
Kathy McMahan
Mary Martin Schaffner
Steve Stafford
Jean A. Stanley
Dwight E. Stokes
D. Michael Swiney
Thomas T. Woodall
Well, if we are examining the integrity of the Tennessee Court of the Judiciary, look no further than Christy R. Little. Judge Christy, before she became Madison County Juvenile Court Judge, was the guardian ad litem in my own child custody case. She is mentioned in my January 24, 2011 post: My Story: For the Love of a Child, Part 1 of 4.
I filed a civil lawsuit, Winchester v. Little, 996 S.W.2d 818 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1998), against Judge Christy in the Madison County Circuit Court for violation of federal constitutional and civil rights, as well as state claims. The attorneys that represented Little were Thomas H. Rainey, John D. Burleson, and Dale Conder, Jr., all with the law firm Rainey, Kizer, Butler, Reviere & Bell. (You will hear a lot more about that law firm, as well as Little, in future postings.) The trial judge, Julian P. Guinn, dismissed the lawsuit on the basis of immunity. In other words, it did not matter what Christy did or did not do; since she was appointed by the court as a GAL, she was immune from liability - she could not be sued. The Tennessee Court of Appeals also agreed that Christy was entitled to absolute quasi-judicial immunity - so no matter how many lies she told, no matter how vexatious they were, she cannot be sued.
JUDGES PROTECTING JUDGES!
No comments:
Post a Comment